Artner, R., Verliefde, T., Steegen, S., Gomes, S., Traets, F., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vanpaemel, W. (2021). The reproducibility of statistical results in psychological research:
An investigation using unpublished raw data.
Psychological Methods,
26(5), 527–546.
https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000365
Barba, L. A. (2018).
Terminologies for Reproducible Research (arXiv:1802.03311).
arXiv.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311
Boudry, C., Alvarez-Muñoz, P., Arencibia-Jorge, R., Ayena, D., Brouwer, N. J., Chaudhuri, Z., Chawner, B., Epee, E., Erraïs, K., Fotouhi, A., Gharaibeh, A. M., Hassanein, D. H., Herwig-Carl, M. C., Howard, K., Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo, D., Laughrea, P.-A., Lopez, F. A., Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D., Malerbi, F. K., … Mouriaux, F. (2019). Worldwide inequality in access to full text scientific articles: The example of ophthalmology.
PeerJ,
7, e7850.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7850
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., Altmejd, A., Buttrick, N., Chan, T., Chen, Y., Forsell, E., Gampa, A., Heikensten, E., Hummer, L., Imai, T., … Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in
Nature and
Science between 2010 and 2015.
Nature Human Behaviour,
2(9), 637–644.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z
Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making
Open Science Work for
Science and
Society.
Environmental Health Perspectives,
127(7), 075002.
https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808
Errington, T. M., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E., & Nosek, B. A. (2021). Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology.
eLife,
10, e67995.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67995
Errington, T. M., Mathur, M., Soderberg, C. K., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E., & Nosek, B. A. (2021). Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology.
eLife,
10, e71601.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71601
Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable
Research Practices Revisited.
Social Psychological and Personality Science,
7(1), 45–52.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150
Open Knowledge Foundation. (2023). Open Definition 2.1. https://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
Science,
349(6251), aac4716–aac4716.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Protzko, J., Krosnick, J., Nelson, L., Nosek, B. A., Axt, J., Berent, M., Buttrick, N., DeBell, M., Ebersole, C. R., Lundmark, S., MacInnis, B., O’Donnell, M., Perfecto, H., Pustejovsky, J. E., Roeder, S. S., Walleczek, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2023). High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable.
Nature Human Behaviour.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01749-9
Schneider, J., Rosman, T., Kelava, A., & Merk, S. (2022). Do
Open-Science Badges Increase Trust in
Scientists Among Undergraduates,
Scientists, and the
Public?
Psychological Science,
33(9), 1588–1604.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221097499
Song, H., Markowitz, D. M., & Taylor, S. H. (2022). Trusting on the shoulders of open giants?
Open science increases trust in science for the public and academics.
Journal of Communication,
72(4), 497–510.
https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac017
UNESCO. (2022). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science.